Comments on: on Blue-Ray: http://jerryleecooper.com/2008/01/21/on-blue-ray/ Gems from the net guru Tue, 06 Jan 2009 04:14:08 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.2 By: ManU http://jerryleecooper.com/2008/01/21/on-blue-ray/#comment-229 ManU Wed, 30 Jan 2008 22:16:04 +0000 http://jerryleecooper.com/2008/01/21/on-blue-ray/#comment-229 Anyway... I still think he smokes pot before writting those articles... Anyway… I still think he smokes pot before writting those articles…

]]> By: Matt http://jerryleecooper.com/2008/01/21/on-blue-ray/#comment-124 Matt Tue, 22 Jan 2008 06:53:23 +0000 http://jerryleecooper.com/2008/01/21/on-blue-ray/#comment-124 Ironically, he is somewhat close to correct here. The modifications required by the AACS to satisfy the inane requirements of BluRay/HD-DVD copy protection would almost assuredly never make their way into Linux, so there probably will never be a legitimate way to decode these commercial disks. Ironically, he is somewhat close to correct here. The modifications required by the AACS to satisfy the inane requirements of BluRay/HD-DVD copy protection would almost assuredly never make their way into Linux, so there probably will never be a legitimate way to decode these commercial disks.

]]> By: Ryan Rife http://jerryleecooper.com/2008/01/21/on-blue-ray/#comment-65 Ryan Rife Mon, 21 Jan 2008 16:00:55 +0000 http://jerryleecooper.com/2008/01/21/on-blue-ray/#comment-65 It's spelled BluRay. It’s spelled BluRay.

]]> By: Don http://jerryleecooper.com/2008/01/21/on-blue-ray/#comment-56 Don Mon, 21 Jan 2008 15:32:17 +0000 http://jerryleecooper.com/2008/01/21/on-blue-ray/#comment-56 Originally appeared here: http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-12554-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=34261&messageID=630617&start=-9976 Originally appeared here:
http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-12554-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=34261&messageID=630617&start=-9976

]]>